yestogc
06-08 06:35 PM
First thing is never give USCIS more than they have asked for.
Send them a letter stating that your previous attorney made a mistake and you have never applied GC before.
secondly since incomplete medicals are bound to have another RFE, there is no harm in sending them revised medicals and yes they have to be sealed from USCIS approved doctors.
Send them a letter stating that your previous attorney made a mistake and you have never applied GC before.
secondly since incomplete medicals are bound to have another RFE, there is no harm in sending them revised medicals and yes they have to be sealed from USCIS approved doctors.
wallpaper side star tattoo
fromnaija
01-25 03:36 PM
I think your lawyer needs to specify your major field of study as civil engineering but in the PERM advert needs to specify civil engineering as equivalent degree accepted for the position.
xbohdpukc
08-05 11:31 AM
as long as both PDs are current they will start to process an application with the earliest RD first.
2011 star tattoo at the ack of
m0r1arty
10-24 10:30 AM
Since there is a few of us up for it, lets try to make it happen. How shall we upload / moderate and so forth.
Swish-db have a pretty good system for integrating Swish / flash and PHP, could bung it on the back end of there.
We could put it here if you've got the resources Kirupa.
LETS GET IT ON!!!
(best try to make something now I s'ppose :x )
-m0r
Swish-db have a pretty good system for integrating Swish / flash and PHP, could bung it on the back end of there.
We could put it here if you've got the resources Kirupa.
LETS GET IT ON!!!
(best try to make something now I s'ppose :x )
-m0r
more...
meridiani.planum
07-23 05:34 AM
All,
Now that Aug is coming up, please post all the 485 LUDs that you have been seeing after 07/18/2008. This will help us getting the pattern, in case USCIS shall auto order the Card production.
no one is auto-ordering card production (whatever that means).
lets stick with vdlrao's thread to track Augusts approvals please. no need for another thread for teh same topic.
Now that Aug is coming up, please post all the 485 LUDs that you have been seeing after 07/18/2008. This will help us getting the pattern, in case USCIS shall auto order the Card production.
no one is auto-ordering card production (whatever that means).
lets stick with vdlrao's thread to track Augusts approvals please. no need for another thread for teh same topic.
GCplease
02-05 07:47 AM
Thanks everyone who shared their experiences.
Much appreciated.
Much appreciated.
more...
pom
10-04 07:40 PM
Ouh, neato! But I don't like the Kirupaforum thing at the bottom :-\
2010 place for star tattoos
santa123
08-06 08:00 PM
Friends,
There used to be a number of threads created / discussed every day on IV... those good ol' days... a lot of good discussions on a variety of topics, including immigration:D
But of late I am seeing fewer threads on IV and wondering what could be the reason.
1. Either a lot of folks got greened and stopped visiting IV
2. or a lot of folks lost jobs & abandoned their GC process
3. or a lot of folks got frustrated and left for their home countries
Is this just me feeling this way or...?
There used to be a number of threads created / discussed every day on IV... those good ol' days... a lot of good discussions on a variety of topics, including immigration:D
But of late I am seeing fewer threads on IV and wondering what could be the reason.
1. Either a lot of folks got greened and stopped visiting IV
2. or a lot of folks lost jobs & abandoned their GC process
3. or a lot of folks got frustrated and left for their home countries
Is this just me feeling this way or...?
more...
billu
05-25 01:02 PM
does anyone have any clue on this??
hair Rihanna Star tattoos
mikoo
03-26 03:13 AM
Anyone interested in meeting lawmakers in Houston area email me at meetthelawmakers@yahoo.com. Also , do mail your phone number so, that we can arrange this asap!
more...
qualified_trash
01-02 07:42 PM
does not seem to be very friendly now !!
http://tinyurl.com/ylnubu
http://tinyurl.com/ylnubu
hot Star Tattoo
Since1997
09-28 04:09 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=82b06a9fec745110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D
more...
house star tattoos on ack.
3dy
03-07 02:24 AM
That's the toughest crossed-words game I ever played! :)
tattoo Back Star Tattoos, Star Tattoo
crazyghoda
06-04 11:17 AM
I'd do the reverse. I am currently working on EAD so I dont want any issues with being without an EAD for even a day. I'd apply exactly at the 120 day mark. Even if I lose some valdity, its ok.
As far as AP is concerned, I dont mind if it comes a bit later or even after the previous one has expired.
3-4 days. These days they are fast on approvals. Best thing is to apply AP within 120 days range and apply EAD when 100 days away from expiry. Atleast you will get 2 years EAD and dont need to pay again.
As far as AP is concerned, I dont mind if it comes a bit later or even after the previous one has expired.
3-4 days. These days they are fast on approvals. Best thing is to apply AP within 120 days range and apply EAD when 100 days away from expiry. Atleast you will get 2 years EAD and dont need to pay again.
more...
pictures Star Tattoo on Back
Blog Feeds
01-27 06:40 AM
Some good news for visa (http://www.h1b.biz/lawyer-attorney-1137085.html)holders that are about to loose their visa sponsored jobs or already lost the visa job. In a decision issued today by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in Matter of Neto, which empowers immigration judges who are considering deportation of individuals with approved work-related visa petitions and pending permanent residence applications. The issue at stake is whether an immigration judge has the authority to decide whether the approved visa petition - issued for one job - remains valid when the individual changes jobs. Without a valid visa petition, the individual will not be eligible for permanent residence.
In 2000, Congress passed the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act, which allowed applicants for permanent residence based on approved visa petitions the flexibility to change jobs. However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas that an immigration judge had no authority to decide whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. This left these applicants for permanent residence in limbo, stripping them of the ability to benefit from the 2000 law while in removal proceedings because the judges couldn't, and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service wouldn't, determine the validity of their visa petition.
Today, in Matter of Neto, the BIA overruled its own earlier decision that denied judges this authority and will now allow them to decide whether a new job is acceptable, thus keeping the individual's eligibility for permanent residence intact. In which case, the visa petition remains valid and the immigrant worker can proceed with an application to become a lawful permanent resident - potentially saving them from deportation.
Read the amicus brief filed by the Legal Action Center Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/NETO-AmiciCuriaeBrief.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/01/ac21_h1b_visas_immigration_jud.html)
In 2000, Congress passed the American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act, which allowed applicants for permanent residence based on approved visa petitions the flexibility to change jobs. However, in 2005, the BIA decided in Matter of Perez-Vargas that an immigration judge had no authority to decide whether a new job was the same as or similar to the old job, which determines validity of their visa petition. This left these applicants for permanent residence in limbo, stripping them of the ability to benefit from the 2000 law while in removal proceedings because the judges couldn't, and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service wouldn't, determine the validity of their visa petition.
Today, in Matter of Neto, the BIA overruled its own earlier decision that denied judges this authority and will now allow them to decide whether a new job is acceptable, thus keeping the individual's eligibility for permanent residence intact. In which case, the visa petition remains valid and the immigrant worker can proceed with an application to become a lawful permanent resident - potentially saving them from deportation.
Read the amicus brief filed by the Legal Action Center Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/NETO-AmiciCuriaeBrief.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/01/ac21_h1b_visas_immigration_jud.html)
dresses Sexy Back Star Tattoos
beebot
02-18 09:38 AM
Your french degree has no compelling equivalency to a masters degree in u.s. educ. level. specially you are just a neophyte in your field (1yr) better apply in quebec ...:( :(
more...
makeup Star tattoos are good because
sinemkeceli
01-26 08:39 PM
can you please let me know what is the meaning of oas ? and do you suggest me to do in order to continue my process in the legal way.
thank you so much
thank you so much
girlfriend Mario Star Tattoo
gcwait2007
07-29 06:02 PM
I am on EAD. my priority date is Oct 2003 EB3.
I got new job that requires security clearance, so applied and got preliminary security clearance and started working as a contractor at Federal worksite.
Now i got letter from Department of homeland security saying i am not allowed to work at Federal worksite because my Adjustment of status is pending from Aug 2007, also saying Contact USCIS to get resolved or provide evidence i am in touch base with USCIS regards to this matter.
Since my priority date is not current, USCIS is not going to anything.
While applying this job i gave my EAD copy. They accepted Now i do know why i got this letter ?
IS there any one had same kind of situation?
Where or whom should I need communicate at USCIS? do they give any letter?
Thanks
Federal assignments are primarily meant for citizens and then in some cases for GC holders. It is impossible for a EAD holder or H1-Bs to join a Fed assignment. I know cases of my friends who have GC and still did not get security clearance from DHS. They moved out of the assignments and moved on in life and career.
I got new job that requires security clearance, so applied and got preliminary security clearance and started working as a contractor at Federal worksite.
Now i got letter from Department of homeland security saying i am not allowed to work at Federal worksite because my Adjustment of status is pending from Aug 2007, also saying Contact USCIS to get resolved or provide evidence i am in touch base with USCIS regards to this matter.
Since my priority date is not current, USCIS is not going to anything.
While applying this job i gave my EAD copy. They accepted Now i do know why i got this letter ?
IS there any one had same kind of situation?
Where or whom should I need communicate at USCIS? do they give any letter?
Thanks
Federal assignments are primarily meant for citizens and then in some cases for GC holders. It is impossible for a EAD holder or H1-Bs to join a Fed assignment. I know cases of my friends who have GC and still did not get security clearance from DHS. They moved out of the assignments and moved on in life and career.
hairstyles ack star tattoos
eyezberg
08-21 07:12 AM
where's the examples then? i'd love to see some good stuff
joe
joe
battineni
06-21 11:07 AM
Hi,
Presently workig for company "A"
My PD : Mar 2004 - EB3
140 - Approved - Mar 2008
Now I'm planning to move to another company("B").
What are the chances to keep my PD, even though my company "A" revokes my 140?
what are the chances/risks for Company"A" to revoke my 140??
Thanks for your time.
Presently workig for company "A"
My PD : Mar 2004 - EB3
140 - Approved - Mar 2008
Now I'm planning to move to another company("B").
What are the chances to keep my PD, even though my company "A" revokes my 140?
what are the chances/risks for Company"A" to revoke my 140??
Thanks for your time.
kuhelica2000
05-27 09:25 PM
I am stuck in PBEC. Please let me know if you need any information.
